Page : 62/76

First Page    Prev. Page    Next Page    Last Page


Wednesday, 13 Jul 2011

13-Jul-2011

I have just sent this inquiry to French Connection UK, via their website's contact form at https://www.frenchconnection.com/contact+us.htm.


Sirs,

I have noticed that your brand is often shortened to the unpronounceable expression, "fcuk". I frequently see these letters on t-shirts and other items of clothing that people are wearing in the high street and about town.

You must surely have noticed, or had it pointed out to you, that these letters are an anagram of the word, "fuck", and indeed, it is quite easy to mis-read the brand name as this ancient English word.

My little children, who are learning to read and write, often switch letters about in words they are trying to pronounce. I am just waiting for the day when my little boy sees a teenager wearing one of these t-shirts and asks me, "Daddy, what does 'fuck' mean?" I have not figured out yet how to reply.

Does any of this bother you?

Yours in bewilderment,

-James Collett.






13-Jul-2011

Bless them - they acknowledged my inquiry promptly:-



Subject: TID 014126 Re: Product question

Thank you for taking the time to contact us.

This acknowledgement is simply to let you know we have received your email. You will receive a response to your enquiry within 24 hours.

Kind Regards,

Customer Services

French Connection
0844 557 3285
www.frenchconnection.com


I know it was just an autoresponder, but still it's prompt.



15-Jul-2011

And here is the actual reply that came soon afterwards:-



Subject: RE: Fwd by:[orders@frenchconnection.com] Product question

Dear James,

Thank you for your e-mail.

We would like to thank you for taking the time and effort to contact us regarding your thoughts and comments on this subject.

We would like to offer our apologies if you have been offended in anyway by our advertising campaigns. We would like to inform you that the slogans that are used on our garments are designed to be ‘tongue in cheek’ and are in no way meant to corrupt or destruct any of our customer’s lives.

We can assure you that our designers and buying team do respect our customer’s comments when deciding on new styles for these ranges. Therefore a copy of your letter has been passed onto both departments to be considered in the future decisions that are made.

Please accept our apologies once again for any offence and inconvenience that has been caused to you or those close to you.

Yours sincerely,

Kirren Lyall

Customer Services Manager

French Connection Retail

customerservice@frenchconnection.com



Thursday, 7 Jul 2011

Time flies - a great - and I think largely unrecognised - track from 2004.

Enjoy:-

A kick-ass live version of one of my favourite songs from Alanis Morissette. Enjoy.

Thursday, 16 Jun 2011

I am embarrassed that I voted for Michael Gove to be my MP. Gove was interviewed on the Today programme and made a fool of himself. There is an allegation in the Telegraph that some Academy schools had been given GBP300 too much per pupil. When asked if this was down to an error made by his department he refused to answer. It's a simple allegation and a simple question.

Gove could easily have answered something like, "I'm not aware of an error made by my department but I will be sure to look into it. We take these accounting matters very seriously." Instead he squandered this opportunity to behave in a civilised way and trotted out the mantra that schools run as academies do better than those that are funded by their LEA.

He deliberately misunderstood the question and blamed local authorities for making mistakes.

The interviewer pressed him again and again on the matter and his response was to start giggling inanely and suggest that she was taking him down an intriguing line of questioning, which she objected to, pointing out it was his refusal to answer that led her to pursue the question.

In one breath he blamed the previous government for setting up a flawed funding system and said that his government was dealing with the mess. In the next, he denied that there was a mess in the financing of academies.

Gove is quick on his feet and can speak with authority but these qualities are not a sufficient substitute for getting properly briefed. This suggests an inexcusable arrogance. His laughing at the interviewer might have been due to arrogance or it might have been due to his realisation of the pickle he'd dropped himself in.

Also he seems to have fallen into the political "Deny Everything" trap, which draws attention to the issue under scrutiny rather than deflecting it. Why?

What could have been an intelligent discussion on the merits of academy schools dissolved - mostly - into
a childish scrap. What a wasted opportunity.

Here is a related article on this interview:-
Christina Odone on Michael Gove Today

STOP PRESS: I have listened to the interview again and I can hear that Gove did at least answer the question about possible errrors by his department with a "not to my knowldege" comment. But - oddly - when Sarah Montague gave him the opportunity to confirm this in a re-iteration, as is the way they do it on the Today programme, he went off on a tangent. That was his missed opportunity.

Saturday, 21 May 2011

"And she will be loved" by Maroon 5

I just love this song and here is a cracking live performance....




Gadzooks! - here is another top performance of the song:-


BlogX.co.uk Beacon