Comments For Entry #214

Alleged Turing Test Success(Comments RSS)

Reading University posted this article on their own website:-

TURING TEST SUCCESS MARKS MILESTONE IN COMPUTING HISTORY

Over on Facebook, my friend Jonathan MacDonald published a brief Voice of Reason post:


Folks. Chatbot vs. Turing test. The Chatbot is not thinking in the cognitive sense. Pls avoid linkbait.



- which I can totally get behind. It got me thinking... and here are my thoughts:-


I think Turing's test was intended to highlight the fact that no-one could define or explain or measure cognition - real thinking - by offering instead a pragmatic, black-box type of test. It seems to me that he was saying, for all his mathematical and logical prowess, that the best discernment of "thinking" came from the gut - i.e. intuition (another thing we do not understand): If it sounds like thought and it smells like thought (to me) then maybe it is.

A: Is it a clock?
B: I can't tell you yet. I haven't opened it up and figured out how it works and if it has the bona fide workings of a clock inside it.
A: Well then - what time is it?
B: Oh...



FYI I do not mean in any way to laud the recent chatbox hypefest, specially as I found out that bellend Kevin Warwick was involved and spouting off.

Here's some more reading (no pun intended):-
No, A 'Supercomputer' Did NOT Pass The Turing Test For The First Time And Everyone Should Know Better

28/3/2018 8:59 AM

This is what we need - an insight to make evneroye think

Add New Comment

Name

E-mail

Homepage

Remember Me           E-mail me replies

Content (HTML not allowed)

 

BlogX.co.uk Beacon